|

Recent Radiocarbon Data For Western Clovis and
High plains Paleo
CREDIT: KENNETH B. TANKERSLEY
Ph.D
I reviewed all of the recent
radiocarbon data for Western Clovis and the High Plains flaked-stone
technologies, typologies, and styles. Two immediate issues came
up.
First, the radiocarbon data for
the last century is not comparable to that in this century. The
new AMS dates have a =?- precision of 40 years, and the samples
are from well-known stratigraphic contexts and compositions.
The second issue is time transgression.
The same styles and technologies did not occur at the same time
in different places. In Wyoming the point styles are older and
in Texas they are younger. Plainview is a good example. Also,
the folks in Texas use a different typological system than they
do in Arizona and Wyoming.
Unfortunately, there are no simple
answers. There are two major theoretical camps--the Texas camp
and the Arizona/Wyoming camps. I have always been with the later
rather than the former. However, your readers are not concerned
with these esoteric issues. The dates below are my time approximations
based on averages across the geographic space of the Plains and
the nomenclature currently in use.
Western Clovis Technological
Complex
10,800 to 11,400, radiocarbon age range
12,500 to 13,500, actual time, years ago
Folsom Technological Complex
10,000 to 10,900, radiocarbon age range
11,160 to 12,900, actual time, years ago
The Scottsbluff technological
complex includes Alberta, Scottsbluff, Firstview, and Eden points,
and the Cody Knife. Some people, however, have a "Cody Complex,"
and "Alberta Complex'" and even an "Alberta Cody
Complex." Basically, it is all the same technology.
Scottsbluff Technological
Complex
8,450 to 9,450, radiocarbon age range
9,500 to 10,500, actual time, years ago
For those who use the term
"Cody Technological Complex"
8,100 to 9,300, radiocarbon age range
8,800 to 10,500, actual time, years ao
For those who use the term
"Alberta Technological Complex"
9,900 to 10,100, radiocarbon age range
11,100 to 11,200, actual time, years ago
For those who use the term
"Alberta-Cody Technological Complex"
9,800 to 10,100, radiocarbon age range
11,000 to 11,200, actual time, years ago
For those who use the term
Firstview Projectile Point
8,450 to 9,450, radiocarbon age range
9,500 to 10,500, actual time, years ago
Midland is a major can of worms.
Some people have it n a single technological complex while others
out it into the Lanceolate Plano Technological Complex. In this
complex, Plainview is tossed in with the Midland, Agate Basin,
Hell Cap, Milnesand, Firstview, and Black Rock Concaved Base.
Also, there is the issue that they date much older in the north
than they do in the south. In Texas, they call Goshen Plainview.
For some time in Wyoming, they called Goshen Goshen Plainview.
Now it is just Goshen in Wyoming and Plainview in Texas.
Midland Projectile Point
10,350 to 10,750, radiocarbon age range
12,350 to 12,500, actual time, years ago
Agate Basin Projectile Point
9,500 to 10,500, radiocarbon age range
10,510 to 1,500, actual time, years ago
Hell Gap Projectile Point|
9,600 to 10,000, radiocarbon age range
10,500 to 11,160, actual time, years ago
Goshen Projectile Point
10,350 to 11,00, radiocarbon age range
12,350 to 12,920, actual time, years ago
Plainview Projectile Point
6,280 to 10,290, radiocarbon age range
7,000 to 12,300. actual time, years ago
Milnesand Projectile Point
9,300 to 10,290, radiocarbon age range
10,500 to 11,300, actual time, years ago
Black Rock Concave Base Projectile
Point
7,000 to 9,000, radiocarbon age range
7,790 to 9,980, actual time, years ago
Rio Grande Projectile Point
9,600 to 10,000, radiocarbon age range
10,500 to 11,160, actual time, years ago
The term "Yuma." originally
coined by Renaud in 1937 was a mixture of lanceolate shaped points,
which included a variety of manufacturing technologies. It was
originally used to talk about non-Folsom Paleoindian. Later,
they were separated into the Plano and Scottsbluff clusters depending
upon their method of manufacture. I realize the term survives
in the amateur/collector circles, professionally, however, it
is an extinct term in 2004.
|